Happy Birthday Mr. Hemingway!

Ernest Hemingway would have been 112! Happy Birthday Hemingway! Your stories continue to inspire and your writing style is still being mimicked today.

Ernest Hemingway (21 July 1899 - 2 July 1961 

Hemingway's Articles from the Toronto Star

From about 1920 to 1923 Hemingway worked as a European Correspondent for the Toronto Star.

His brief stunt there, enabled him to fully develop his original style; something that he is known for today.
Below are two links to some of the articles he wrote. If you read them, you can really see how his writing began to take shape.

Toronto Star 1
Toronto Star 2

Hemingway's Style Sheet from Kansas City Star

From October 1917 to April 1918, Hemingway worked as a reporter for the Kansas City Star.  It was short-lived because he would eventually run off to join in the Toronto Star.

However, while he was there, the editor given him a style sheet. It outlined all the "rights" and "wrongs" when writing a news story for the paper. This would prove to be a valuable tool, and at the time, Hemingway himself might not of had any idea how important it would become to his writing.

One who's keen on Hemingway's style can see that his ice-burg, well defined sentence structure, and ability to omit just the right amount to give the reader a concise read, is somewhat grounded here.

For a brief moment, you can experience what Hemingway might have felt that early morning when the editor handed him the sheet that would go on to define his writing style.

Below is the guidelines that Hemingway honored his whole life. You can see a nice PDF text version here, and a copy of the original one given out during Hemingway's time at the Kansas City Star, here. Also, you can read the articles that Hemingway wrote for the newspaper, here.


The Star Copy Style
Use short sentences. Use short first paragraphs. Use vigorous English. Be positive, not
negative.
The style of local communications is To The Star: in italics, out-of-town communications
in this form. Salina, Kas. – To The Star:
Never use old slang. Such words as stunt, cut out, got his goat, come across, sit up and
take notice, put one over, have no place after their use becomes common. Slang to be
enjoyable must be fresh.
Use Kas., not Kan. or Kans., as an abbreviation for Kansas: use Ok., not Okla., for
Oklahoma, Col., not Colo., for Colorado; Cal., not Calif., for California.
Watch you sequence of tenses. “He said he knew the truth, not “He said he knows the
truth.” “The community was amazed to hear that Charles Wakefield was a thief,” not was
amazed to hear that Charles Wakefield is a thief.”
The style of The Star is 9:30 o’clock this afternoon or this morning or tonight; not 9:30
this forenoon, 9:30 p.m. or 9:30 this evening. Also let the hour precede – not this morning
at 9:30 o’clock.  He walked twelve miles, not a distance of twelve miles; he earned $10,
not he earned the amount or sum of $10; he went there to see his wife, not for the purpose
of seeing his wife. He was absent during June, not during the month of June.
“Goods valued at about $25 were stolen,” not “about $25 worth of goods were stolen.”
“Several fountain pens were stolen,” not “a number of fountain pens” – if you know the
number, specify.
Eliminate every superfluous word as “Funeral services will be at 2 o’clock Tuesday,” not
“The funeral services will be held at the hour of 2 o’clock on Tuesday.”  He said is better
than he said in the course of conversation.
In reference to specified time the word on is superfluous. Why write on January 16; on
Tuesday? January 16 and Tuesday are enough.
Don’t split verbs: He probably will go, not he will probably go. It previously had been
shown better; not it had previously been better shown.
The verb precedes the time: He sold yesterday afternoon; not he yesterday afternoon sold.
In certain instances, euphony or smoothness may admit a deviation from this rule.
Be careful of the word also. It usually modifies the word it follows closest. “He, also,
went” means “He too went.” “He went also” means he went in addition to taking some
other action.Be careful of the word “only.” “He only had $10,” means he alone was the possessor of
such wealth.” “He had only $10,” means the ten was all the cash he possessed.
The Rev. Q.Z. Smith, D.D., not the Rev. Dr. Q.Z. Smith.
Mr. Smith or Dr. Smith; not the Rev. Smith or the Rev. Mr. Smith or the Rev. Dr. Smith.
Never call a minister a doctor unless he is a doctor of divinity.
He went to police headquarters, not he came to police headquarters. “He came to the
office of The Star” would be correct.
“The police tried to find her husband,” not tried to locate her husband. To locate, used as
a transitive verb, means to establish.
“He was ill in February” not “He was ill during February.” During February would mean
every fraction of a second of the month’s time. A body may deliberate during the day, but
that means no recess was taken in the entire period.
Don’t split infinitives – He wanted to live longer, not to longer live.
Avoid the use of adjectives, especially such extravagant ones as splendid, gorgeous,
grand, magnificent, etc.
Say the girl was of light complexion, not light complected.
Say evening clothes, not full dress.
Say patrolmen not in uniform, not plain clothes men. Do not use cop.
A burglar enters a building where persons are sleeping – use thief or robber in other
cases.
Use revolver or pistol, not gun, unless a shotgun is meant.
The thief seized her purse, not grabbed or snatched.
State things in writing, otherwise say, assert, declare, etc.
Say, “She was born in Ireland and came to Jackson County in 1874” not “but came to
Jackson County.” She didn’t come here to make amends for being born in Ireland. This is
common abuse of the conjunction.
“Smith asserted he had been arrested falsely,” not claimed he had been arrested.”Use we should, they would. For instance, not, “We would like to see these abuses
corrected.” That would be an appeal. The simple statement is, “We should like to see
these abuses corrected.”
Don’t say “He had his leg cut off in an accident.” He wouldn’t have had it done for
anything.
“He suffered a broken leg in a fall,” not “he broke his leg in a fall.” He didn’t break the
leg, the fall did. Say a leg, not his leg, because presumably the man has two legs.
“The work began,” not the work was begun.”
He was graduated from Manual,” not “he graduated from Manual.”
Say Mary went shopping with Mabel – not “in company with” Mabel.
“Honor the memory of J.V.C. Karnes” not “honor J.V.C. Karnes” after his death.
Say “John Jones of St. Louis,” no comma between Jones and of.
“Mr Roosevelt is a leader who, we believe, would succeed,” not “whom, we believe,
would.”
“Mr. Roosevelt is a leader whom, we believe the people will choose,” not “who, we
believe.”
“None saw him except me,” not “none saw him but me.” Don’t use but as a preposition.
Use or after either, nor after neither, as a general rule. Certain deviations from this
statement are good English, but extreme care in usage is best.
Indorsement of a candidate, not endorsement.
Say Chinese, not Chinamen.
Bodies are not shipped or sent – say “The burial will be in Ottumwa, Ia.”
Several persons were in the room,” not “several people.” “The people of Kansas City” is
correct.
Both persons were pleased, not “both parties were pleased.” “Both parties to the
contract” is correct.
He knew no good reason that he should not run” is better than “he knew no good reason
why he should not run.”“He threw the stone,” not “He threw the rock.” Rock is unquarried stone.
Write 250,000, 500,000, 750,000 and 1,000,000, 1/4 million, 1/2 million, 3/4 million and
1 million respectively.
Numbers less than 100 should be spelled out, except in matter of statistical nature, in
ages, time of day, sums of money and comparative figures or dimensions.
In writing of animals use the neuter gender except when you are writing of a pet that has
a name. Then it is permissible to use the masculine or feminine
“The man left the car while it was in motion is simpler and better than “alighted from the
car.”
“The man was sentenced to be hanged,” not to be hung.”
“The death sentence was “executed,” not “The man was executed.”
The execution of the death sentence,” not “the execution of the man.”
The prisoner was electrocised, not electrocuted.
“None of them is so sorry as myself,” not “none of them are so sorry.”
He was “eager to go,” not anxious to go.” You are anxious about a friend who is ill.
“If I were king,” not if I was king.”
“The building was partly insured,” not partially insured.”
“It seemed as if he meant business,” not “as though he meant business.” Do not say “she
looked like she would faint. Say as if.
A long quotation with out introducing the speaker makes a poor lead especially and is
bad at any time. Break into the quotation as soon as you can. thus: “I should prefer,” the
speaker said, “to let the reader know who I am as soon as possible.”
Try to preserve the atmosphere of the speech in your quotation. For instance in quoting a
child, do not let him say “Inadvertently, I picked up the stone and threw it.”
“He saw more than one thousand ducks flying” – not “over one thousand ducks.” Also
say “fewer than” instead of “less than,” when numbers, not quantity, are considered. It is
proper to write “He had more than $10.”
“He was made unconscious,” not “he was rendered unconscious.”He died on the sidewalk,” not “He fell dead on the sidewalk.”
Never say “The deceased.”
Such words as “tots, “urchins, “mites of humanity” are not to be used in writing of
children. In certain cases, where “kids” conveys just the proper shading and fits the story,
it is permissible.
Watch out for trite phrases such as “Burly negro,” “crisp bank note,” “cold cash,” “hard
cash,” etc.
Avoid expressions from a foreign tongue “He received $2 a day” is English, not
“received $2 per day.”
A man marries a woman: she is married to him.
“The voters will choose among the several candidates,” “not between” the several.”
Choose between two candidates is correct.
“Twenty attended the meeting among others, C.W. Armour, J.C. Nichols.” The word
others implies that the persons mentioned are apart from persons already mentioned, but
the implication does not hold true. The sentence should read: “Twenty attended, among
them, C.W. Armour and J.C. Nichols.”
He died of heart disease, not heart failure – everybody dies of “heart failure.”
Representative Bland, not Congressman Bland. The members of both the house and
senate are Congressmen. The titles “Representative” and “Senator” distinguish them.
“He suspected the negro was guilty,” not “He suspicioned the negro was guilty.” “The
police were suspicious of him,” not “The police considered him suspicious.” Do not use
suspect as a noun.
The words donate and donation are barred from the columns of The Star. Use give or
contribute. The use of raise in the sense of obtaining money has been forced into usage
where no other word seems to do as well. But raise is not a noun.
Don’t confuse the words habit and custom as “John Jones was a victim of the drug habit.”
“It was the custom of John Jones to go to the bank at 11 o’clock each day.”
A man is not arrested for “investigation.” There is no such charge as “investigation.”
The Star does not use “dope” or “dope fiend.” Use habit forming drugs or narcotics and
addicts.
Don’t say: “Three men put in an appearance.” Just let them “appear.”Do not use picnic as a verb.
Say luncheon, not lunch.
You expect a record crowd, not anticipate it. But you can anticipate some legal action,
for example, by taking some step of precaution, and be correct in usage.
Portion in almost all cases refers to food. “Portion” of an estate is correct, however.
Watch for plural collective nouns; they take singular verbs. “The committee was
discharged.” “The company was solvent.” Three thousand dollars was stolen.”
Spell it program, quarter, quintet, etc.
Call it parent-teacher association.
Do not use the term squad in referring to motor cars or traffic policemen. Write “Sergeant
Jones of the motor cycle police,” or “Lieutenant McCormick of the traffic police.” A
squad is a fixed and limited number of men.
In Jefferson City, preferable to at Jefferson City.
Probably with not likely will.
As to use of state after name of a city. Use state except where city is so well known as to
make the name of the state entirely superfluous. Use state where there are two or more
cities of that name. In connection with this, however, use Independence, when
Independence, Mo., is meant; use Independence, Kas.
Avoid using that too frequently, but govern use largely by euphony, and strive for
smoothness.
Say the morning edition of The Star.
In most cases, desire is preferable to want.
Say crippled boy, but not a cripple.
Each other applies to two, one another to three or more.
Latter applies to one of two. Where more than two are considered, last is the word.
If is used to introduce a supposition clause, as, I shall not go if it rains. It is incorrect to
say: I do not know if I can go. The correct form is whether: I do not know whether I can
go.Resolutions are adopted, not passed. Bills are passed and laws are enacted. The house or
senate passed a bill; congress or the legislature enacted a law.
Do not use evidence as a verb. This wrong use is especially common and the past tense
form. Burglarized and jailed are equally objectionable.
Both simplicity and good taste suggest home rather than residence, and lives rather than
resides.
“John Jones, who was arrested yesterday, and who furnished release bond, was arrested
again today.” The second who is superfluous.
Equally As - The as is superfluous.
He Was Presented With - This is an old offender, which gets in despite all injunctions and
a general knowledge that the with is entirely superfluous.
A Woman of the Name of Mary Jones - Disrespect is attached to the individual in such
sentences. Avoid it. Never use it even in referring to street walkers.
Admittance and Admission - Admittance is better than admission in relation to admittance
fees and admittance to places, lodges, etc.
Motor car is preferred but automobile is not incorrect.
In marking typographical style in copy, conform to the adopted style sheet of The Star.

FBI's declassified Ernest Hemingway document

Yep, it's true. The FBI had Ernest Hemingway under surveillance. Why you may ask? Well, it's because he lived in Cuba.

This document, coming in at around 150pgs covers Hemingway from 1942 until 13yrs after his death (1974). However, the bulk of reports come while Hemingway was living in Cuba. The FBI vault website states that,

"The Bulk of it concerns Hemingway's intelligence work on behalf of the U.S. Embassy in Havana, Cuba between 1942 and 1944."

It's quite an interesting read. Hemingway actually had a team of people (unknown to officials) that was working for him. The Embassy gave him $500 a month to pay these people and wouldn't inform them of who they were, only that they worked in bars, restaurants, and the town center. Team Hemingway was to gather information and report to him who would in turn report to the Embassy.

There are also some interesting bits in their that shed light onto the daily activities of Hemingway, which were used by someone as a bases for an argument to Hoover (head of FBI) to stop Hemingway's involvment because he was reckless and would do more harm than good.

Also of note, later in Hemingway's life he was committed to a psych ward. There had been reports that we was paranoid  that people were following him and that his phone, house, and car were being tapped. People thought he was crazy (not that main reason for going in). Actually, he wasn't! Big brother was there.

I know, you want to read it now, right? Well click here --> Ernest Hemingway's FBI file to be taken to the FBI vault to download the PDF for free. I've noticed a few sites attempting to sell it--don't buy it!

Hemingway Letters Coming Soon!

The Hemingway letters are coming! Published by Cambridge University Press, this is the 1st of 12+ volumes of personal letters by Hemingway. What is fascinating is that around 85% of these letters have never been seen before.

It's release date is 31 October 2011 (Halloween) with the second volume to be published in 2012.

The first book will cover ALL surviving Hemingway letters that were written between 1907-1922:

"This volume will encompass his youth, World War I, and his arrival in Paris."


So it looks like we'll have to wait until the second volume to start reading letters he wrote during his publication years, which started in 1923

At the time of this entry, Amazon is having a special pre-order sale and you can pick it  up for only $26.40.

I believe this will definitely breath some life into Hemingway studies; not that the field needs any short of revival.

I've been following The Hemingway Society  for some time now, and they are the ones that are spearheading this publication. They have collected over 6,000 letters and have been working on this project for some time. I'm glad it's finally going to be available!

Ernest Hemingway's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

This video is something special. His acceptance speech for the Novel Prize. Oddly enough, he didn't attend the ceremony due to injuries sustained in two plan crashes in Africa. Thus, on the 10th of December, 1954 US Ambassador to Sweden, John C. Cabot, read Hemingway's speech. What you're about to hear is Ernest Hemingway's reading of the speech which he recorded at a local radio station. 

                      

Here is the text:

«Having no facility for speech-making and no command of oratory nor any domination of rhetoric, I wish to thank the administrators of the generosity of Alfred Nobel for this Prize.

No writer who knows the great writers who did not receive the Prize can accept it other than with humility. There is no need to list these writers. Everyone here may make his own list according to his knowledge and his conscience.

It would be impossible for me to ask the Ambassador of my country to read a speech in which a writer said all of the things which are in his heart. Things may not be immediately discernible in what a man writes, and in this sometimes he is fortunate; but eventually they are quite clear and by these and the degree of alchemy that he possesses he will endure or be forgotten.

Writing, at its best, is a lonely life. Organizations for writers palliate the writer's loneliness but I doubt if they improve his writing. He grows in public stature as he sheds his loneliness and often his work deteriorates. For he does his work alone and if he is a good enough writer he must face eternity, or the lack of it, each day.

For a true writer each book should be a new beginning where he tries again for something that is beyond attainment. He should always try for something that has never been done or that others have tried and failed. Then sometimes, with great luck, he will succeed.

How simple the writing of literature would be if it were only necessary to write in another way what has been well written. It is because we have had such great writers in the past that a writer is driven far out past where he can go, out to where no one can help him.

I have spoken too long for a writer. A writer should write what he has to say and not speak it. Again I thank you.»

source

A look at Hemingway

Here is a brief look into the life of Ernest Hemingway during his writing years.